演讲观后感

ted演讲观后感 篇1

<国王的演讲》乍看之下这仿佛是一个励志故事，当然，这么认为也没有任何的问题，一个患有语言障碍的王室公爵在皇室、国家的紧迫情势之下，努力克服自己的缺陷、积极去改变，最终逃出了缺陷的阴影，而终于让那些质疑、担忧、讥讽等等的公众舆论烟消云散，最终也不失为一个伟大的国王。

这个故事的励志意义另一部分也因另一个人物的所作所对比升华：George的兄弟Edward，本是一个风度翩翩的皇室公爵，王位的理所应当的继承人，却因人生际遇和风流个性，逐渐的放弃了对王位的追逐，也从一个侧面说明了，天赋如果不为后天善用，也会逐渐被磨灭，被荒废;而对于George来说，一个对于王位继承者来说相当有阻碍的缺陷，如果有心去改变、不停的尝试，最终也会得到纠正，获得真正的自信。

你也可以认为这是一个为了讲述伟大王与民、医与患无差别友情的故事，语言治疗师洛格和王室继承人George齐心战胜“顽疾”，两个人一同为对自己来说是一件非常艰巨的任务而奋斗。当然，这个“顽疾”不同于表面上那样简单，仅仅是“口吃”或者“发音”，或是“说话是否流利”的问题。在当时的国际情势下，而在王储之中的理想继任者却沉迷风流韵事不思大体，而对于当时社会和国际情势动荡的情况下，一个强有力的国王，一个英明的统帅，一举一动都为人们所关注，人民希望得到希望和自信，希望看到一个能给他们安全感的王。因此George的“顽疾”，反而显得那么的引人注目，因为对于国王和重大场合而言，一场有力、有自信的完美的演讲，对于王室、国民和公众来说，都是必不可少需要的事情。

所以如果George是个平常的人，或许他有口吃，或许他的发音有问题，这都没什么，他可以选择成为作家、卖笔杆子，他可以选择出卖体力来维持生计，他可以尽量避开交际、闭门闭户，这都是没什么重要的事情，他自己和别人也许都不会觉得这是多么有问题的一件事。然而他却成为一个有语言缺陷的王室继承人、国王，一个小问题也许就成为了大困难，就像Edward一样，一个花花公子其实没什么，但是因为出身背景和责任，就显得有些失大体、不成器之感，其实都是位置造就的，因为人并不能选择自己的出身。

讲到这里，我想，很多人也许都在羡慕另一种生活，其实所有的生活都是一座围城，除非你可以拥有每一座城门的钥匙而可以自由进入，否则，并不要轻易羡慕或者盲目追寻另外的生活，除非你已经想得透彻，或者是你个永不思悔的人。

ted演讲观后感 篇2

Dear,

Every child is surrounded by the deep mother love. However, we often turn a blind eye to the love. One day I deeply felt the love.

One day I hurried home for lunch after school, because there would be an exam in the afternoon and I had expected to go back to school early to prepare for the exam. But when I got home, the lunch was not ready yet.

I felt unhappy. When the dishes were served, I forund none I like. I ran out of my house angrily and wanderde on the street for a while,hungry. Then I walked to school.When I got into the classroom, I saw a lunch box on my desk. One classmate told me that it was my mother ther that had brought it here.After opening the box, I found my favorite food inside. My eyes was moist with tears.Mother gave me her love without asking for return, How deep mother love is!

Thanks!

ted演讲观后感 篇3

I gave this talk at Facebook not so long ago to about 100 employees, and a couple hours later, there was a young woman who works there sitting outside my little desk, and she wanted to talk to me. I said, okay, and she sat down, and we talked. And she said, "I learned something today. I learned that I need to keep my hand up." "What do you mean?"She said, "You're giving this talk, and you said you would take two more questions. I had my hand up with many other people, and you took two more questions. I put my hand down, and I noticed all the women did the same, and then you took more questions, only from the men." And I thought to myself,"Wow, if it's me — who cares about this, obviously — giving this talk — and during this talk.

ted演讲观后感 篇4

i'd like to share with you a discovery that i made a few months ago while writing an article for italian wired. i always keep my thesaurus handy whenever i'm writing anything, but i'd already finished editing the piece, and i realized that i had never once in my life looked up the word "disabled" to see what i'd find.

let me read you the entry. "disabled, adjective: crippled, helpless, useless, wrecked, stalled, maimed, wounded, mangled, lame, mutilated, run-down, worn-out, weakened, impotent, castrated, paralyzed, handicapped, senile, decrepit, laid-up, done-up, done-for, done-in cracked-up, counted-out; see also hurt, useless and weak. antonyms, healthy, strong, capable." i was reading this list out loud to a friend and at first was laughing, it was so ludicrous, but i'd just gotten past "mangled," and my voice broke, and i had to stop and collect myself from the emotional shock and impact that the assault from these words unleashed.

you know, of course, this is my raggedy old thesaurus so i'm thinking this must be an ancient print date, right? but, in fact, the print date was the early 1980s, when i would have been starting primary school and forming an understanding of myself outside the family unit and as related to the other kids and the world around me. and, needless to say, thank god i wasn't using a thesaurus back then. i mean, from this entry, it would seem that i was born into a world that perceived someone like me to have nothing positive whatsoever going for them, when in fact, today i'm celebrated for the opportunities and adventures my life has procured.

so, i immediately went to look up the online edition, epecting to find a revision worth noting. here's the updated version of this entry. unfortunately, it's not much better. i find the last two words under "near antonyms," particularly unsettling: "whole" and "wholesome."

so, it's not just about the words. it's what we believe about people when we name them with these words. it's about the values behind the words, and how we construct those values. our language affects our thinking and how we view the world and how we view other people. in fact, many ancient societies, including the greeks and the romans, believed that to utter a curse verbally was so powerful, because to say the thing out loud brought it into eistence. so, what reality do we want to call into eistence: a person who is limited, or a person who's empowered? by casually doing something as simple as naming a person, a child, we might be putting lids and casting shadows on their power. wouldn't we want to open doors for them instead?

one such person who opened doors for me was my childhood doctor at the a.i. dupont institute in wilmington, delaware. his name was dr. pizzutillo, an italian american, whose name, apparently, was too difficult for most americans to pronounce, so he went by dr. p. and dr. p always wore really colorful bow ties and had the very perfect disposition to work with children.

i loved almost everything about my time spent at this hospital, with the eception of my physical therapy sessions. i had to do what seemed like innumerable repetitions of eercises with these thick, elastic bands -- different colors, you know -- to help build up my leg muscles, and i hated these bands more than anything -- i hated them, had names for them. i hated them. and, you know, i was already bargaining, as a five year-old child, with dr. p to try to get out of doing these eercises, unsuccessfully, of course. and, one day, he came in to my session -- ehaustive and unforgiving, these sessions -- and he said to me, "wow. aimee, you are such a strong and powerful little girl, i think you're going to break one of those bands. when you do break it, i'm going to give you a hundred bucks."

now, of course, this was a simple ploy on dr. p's part to get me to do the eercises i didn't want to do before the prospect of being the richest five-year-old in the second floor ward, but what he effectively did for me was reshape an awful daily occurrence into a new and promising eperience for me. and i have to wonder today to what etent his vision and his declaration of me as a strong and powerful little girl shaped my own view of myself as an inherently strong, powerful and athletic person well into the future.

this is an eample of how adults in positions of power can ignite the power of a child. but, in the previous instances of those thesaurus entries, our language isn't allowing us to evolve into the reality that we would all want, the possibility of an individual to see themselves as capable. our language hasn't caught up with the changes in our society, many of which have been brought about by technology. certainly, from a medical standpoint, my legs, laser surgery for vision impairment, titanium knees and hip replacements for aging bodies that are allowing people to more fully engage with their abilities, and move beyond the limits that nature has imposed on them -- not to mention social networking platforms allow people to self-identify, to claim their own descriptions of themselves, so they can go align with global groups of their own choosing. so, perhaps technology is revealing more clearly to us now what has always been a truth: that everyone has something rare and powerful to offer our society, and that the human ability to adapt is our greatest asset.

the human ability to adapt, it's an interesting thing, because people have continually wanted to talk to me about overcoming adversity, and i'm going to make an admission: this phrase never sat right with me, and i always felt uneasy trying to answer people's questions about it, and i think i'm starting to figure out why. implicit in this phrase of "overcoming adversity" is the idea that success, or happiness, is about emerging on the other side of a challenging eperience unscathed or unmarked by the eperience, as if my successes in life have come about from an ability to sidestep or circumnavigate the presumed pitfalls of a life with prosthetics, or what other people perceive as my disability. but, in fact, we are changed. we are marked, of course, by a challenge, whether physically, emotionally or both. and i'm going to suggest that this is a good thing. adversity isn't an obstacle that we need to get around in order to resume living our life. it's part of our life. and i tend to think of it like my shadow. sometimes i see a lot of it, sometimes there's very little, but it's always with me. and, certainly, i'm not trying to diminish the impact, the weight, of a person's struggle.

there is adversity and challenge in life, and it's all very real and relative to every single person, but the question isn't whether or not you're going to meet adversity, but how you're going to meet it. so, our responsibility is not simply shielding those we care for from adversity, but preparing them to meet it well. and we do a disservice to our kids when we make them feel that they're not equipped to adapt. there's an important difference and distinction between the objective medical fact of my being an amputee and the subjective societal opinion of whether or not i'm disabled. and, truthfully, the only real and consistent disability i've had to confront is the world ever thinking that i could be described by those definitions.

in our desire to protect those we care about by giving them the cold, hard truth about their medical prognosis, or, indeed, a prognosis on the epected quality of their life, we have to make sure that we don't put the first brick in a wall that will actually disable someone. perhaps the eisting model of only looking at what is broken in you and how do we fi it, serves to be more disabling to the individual than the pathology itself.

by not treating the wholeness of a person, by not acknowledging their potency, we are creating another ill on top of whatever natural struggle they might have. we are effectively grading someone's worth to our community. so we need to see through the pathology and into the range of human capability. and, most importantly, there's a partnership between those perceived deficiencies and our greatest creative ability. so it's not about devaluing, or negating, these more trying times as something we want to avoid or sweep under the rug, but instead to find those opportunities wrapped in the adversity. so maybe the idea i want to put out there is not so much overcoming adversity as it is opening ourselves up to it, embracing it, grappling with it, to use a wrestling term, maybe even dancing with it. and, perhaps, if we see adversity as natural, consistent and useful, we're less burdened by the presence of it.

this year we celebrate the 200th birthday of charles darwin, and it was 150 years ago, when writing about evolution, that darwin illustrated, i think, a truth about the human character. to paraphrase: it's not the strongest of the species that survives, nor is it the most intelligent that survives; it is the one that is most adaptable to change. conflict is the genesis of creation. from darwin's work, amongst others, we can recognize that the human ability to survive and flourish is driven by the struggle of the human spirit through conflict into transformation. so, again, transformation, adaptation, is our greatest human skill. and, perhaps, until we're tested, we don't know what we're made of. maybe that's what adversity gives us: a sense of self, a sense of our own power. so, we can give ourselves a gift. we can re-imagine adversity as something more than just tough times. maybe we can see it as change. adversity is just change that we haven't adapted ourselves to yet.

i think the greatest adversity that we've created for ourselves is this idea of normalcy. now, who's normal? there's no normal. there's common, there's typical. there's no normal, and would you want to meet that poor, beige person if they eisted? (laughter) i don't think so. if we can change this paradigm from one of achieving normalcy to one of possibility or potency, to be even a little bit more dangerous -- we can release the power of so many more children, and invite them to engage their rare and valuable abilities with the community.

anthropologists tell us that the one thing we as humans have always required of our community members is to be of use, to be able to contribute. there's evidence that neanderthals, 60,000 years ago, carried their elderly and those with serious physical injury, and perhaps it's because the life eperience of survival of these people proved of value to the community. they didn't view these people as broken and useless; they were seen as rare and valuable.

a few years ago, i was in a food market in the town where i grew up in that red zone in northeastern pennsylvania, and i was standing over a bushel of tomatoes. it was summertime: i had shorts on. i hear this guy, his voice behind me say, "well, if it isn't aimee mullins." and i turn around, and it's this older man. i have no idea who he is.

and i said, "i'm sorry, sir, have we met? i don't remember meeting you."

he said, "well, you wouldn't remember meeting me. i mean, when we met i was delivering you from your mother's womb." (laughter) oh, that guy. and, but of course, actually, it did click.

this man was dr. kean, a man that i had only known about through my mother's stories of that day, because, of course, typical fashion, i arrived late for my birthday by two weeks. and so my mother's prenatal physician had gone on vacation, so the man who delivered me was a complete stranger to my parents. and, because i was born without the fibula bones, and had feet turned in, and a few toes in this foot and a few toes in that, he had to be the bearer -- this stranger had to be the bearer of bad news.

he said to me, "i had to give this prognosis to your parents that you would never walk, and you would never have the kind of mobility that other kids have or any kind of life of independence, and you've been making liar out of me ever since." (laughter) (applause)

the etraordinary thing is that he said he had saved newspaper clippings throughout my whole childhood, whether winning a second grade spelling bee, marching with the girl scouts, you know, the halloween parade, winning my college scholarship, or any of my sports victories, and he was using it, and integrating it into teaching resident students, med students from hahnemann medical school and hershey medical school. and he called this part of the course the factor, the potential of the human will. no prognosis can account for how powerful this could be as a determinant in the quality of someone's life. and dr. kean went on to tell me, he said, "in my eperience, unless repeatedly told otherwise, and even if given a modicum of support, if left to their own devices, a child will achieve."

see, dr. kean made that shift in thinking. he understood that there's a difference between the medical condition and what someone might do with it. and there's been a shift in my thinking over time, in that, if you had asked me at 15 years old, if i would have traded prosthetics for flesh-and-bone legs, i wouldn't have hesitated for a second. i aspired to that kind of normalcy back then. but if you ask me today, i'm not so sure. and it's because of the eperiences i've had with them, not in spite of the eperiences i've had with them. and perhaps this shift in me has happened because i've been eposed to more people who have opened doors for me than those who have put lids and cast shadows on me.

see, all you really need is one person to show you the epiphany of your own power, and you're off. if you can hand somebody the key to their own power -- the human spirit is so receptive -- if you can do that and open a door for someone at a crucial moment, you are educating them in the best sense. you're teaching them to open doors for themselves. in fact, the eact meaning of the word "educate" comes from the root word "educe." it means "to bring forth what is within, to bring out potential." so again, which potential do we want to bring out?

there was a case study done in 1960s britain, when they were moving from grammar schools to comprehensive schools. it's called the streaming trials. we call it "tracking" here in the states. it's separating students from a, b, c, d and so on. and the "a students" get the tougher curriculum, the best teachers, etc. well, they took, over a three-month period, d-level students, gave them a's, told them they were "a's," told them they were bright, and at the end of this three-month period, they were performing at a-level.

and, of course, the heartbreaking, flip side of this study, is that they took the "a students" and told them they were "d's." and that's what happened at the end of that three-month period. those who were still around in school, besides the people who had dropped out. a crucial part of this case study was that the teachers were duped too. the teachers didn't know a switch had been made. they were simply told, "these are the 'a-students,' these are the 'd-students.'" and that's how they went about teaching them and treating them.

so, i think that the only true disability is a crushed spirit, a spirit that's been crushed doesn't have hope, it doesn't see beauty, it no longer has our natural, childlike curiosity and our innate ability to imagine. if instead, we can bolster a human spirit to keep hope, to see beauty in themselves and others, to be curious and imaginative, then we are truly using our power well. when a spirit has those qualities, we are able to create new realities and new ways of being.

i'd like to leave you with a poem by a fourteenth-century persian poet named hafiz that my friend, jacques dembois told me about, and the poem is called "the god who only knows four words": "every child has known god, not the god of names, not the god of don'ts, but the god who only knows four words and keeps repeating them, saying, 'come dance with me. come, dance with me. come, dance with me.'"

thank you. (applause)

ted演讲观后感 篇5

The problem with these stories is that they show what the data shows: women systematically underestimate their own abilities. If you test men and women, and you ask them questions on totally objective criteria like GPAs, men get it wrong slightly high, and women get it wrong slightly low. Women do not negotiate for themselves in the workforce. A study in the last two years of people entering the workforce out of college showed that 57 percent of boys entering, or men, I guess, are negotiating their first salary, and only seven percent of women. And most importantly, men attribute their success to themselves, and women attribute it to other external factors. If you ask men why they did a good job,they'll say, "I'm awesome. Obviously. Why are you even asking?" If you ask women why they did a good job, what they'll say is someone helped them, they got lucky, they worked really hard.

ted演讲观后感 篇6

罗格其实不是医生，他自己也从没有这么叫过自己，他只是个在学校里面教演讲学的一位教授。他没有培训的执照，没有职业的认证，有的只是勇气。

那次温布利球场上的演讲，罗格在场，他目睹了国王的窘迫。他的儿子对他说：“爸爸，你觉得你能帮帮他吗?”是的，他很擅长演说这方面的事。他帮助那些只会吼不会说的年轻人学习演说，他能做到是因为他了解他们。这些年轻人在竭力演说，但却没有人在听。他的工作便是让他们重新相信自己的声音，让他们知道还有人在听。

对国王来说，也一样。

为什么别人要听你讲话？因为你有你的声音。

国王一直在与自己做斗争。

国王，英德交战的地方是你的战士的战场，到录音室的那几十米是一段很长的路。到了，那便是你的战场。

红色的灯再次闪烁起来，这次不像是挑衅，更像是一种鼓励——它是什么其实全在于你自己。

又是漫长的等待，所有人都为国王捏紧了一把汗。

罗格和国王面对着面站着，罗格对他忠诚的朋友投去了鼓励的目光——也许就是这个目光，这个关键时刻Bertie最需要的目光，给了Bertie开口的勇气。

也许最开始，罗格只是想完成自己儿子的希望，才决定帮助Bertie。至少现在看来，这是个正确的决定。毕竟，他们都是父亲。

演讲很成功。就是这次二战爆发前夕的那次著名的演讲，鼓舞了全国上下的人民和英国士兵的斗志。

ted演讲观后感 篇7

他，一个残疾人，无手无脚，因为自己的梦想，坚持执着的生活着。但是上帝终究太喜欢他了，取走了他的双手与双臂，却又赐给他了最独特的“小鸡腿”，和一颗宝贵的善良、坚韧的心。

他，仅有单只"小鸡脚"的他，却能够笑容每天绽放在唇边。多么残酷的现实，多么坚强的行为!看完《我和世界不一样》，震撼、同情与悲痛......萦绕着我。

他，就是力克·胡哲。他的出生非常不幸，相比之下他的人生的起点就比别人矮了一大截。可想而知，这样的他要经历多少的磨难、奚落与嘲笑。虽然现在呈现在我们面前的是一个有说有笑，会蹦会跳的演说家——力克·胡哲。但是在这成功的光环后，又有多少的汗水与泪水。我们总会觉得残疾人是最有资格埋怨与愤怒的。是，没错!残疾人确实可以选择抱怨。但同样他们也可以选择积极的面对。力克·胡哲就是最好的见证。当我们站在绝望的边缘，你可以选择跳下去，一了百了。也可以选择回头，重新回到起点，用行动活出新的生命。力克胡哲曾经这样总结他的生活：“我看到了神的恩典，我看到他拿走了我生命中最大的碎片，把它变得美丽。我想，我有这些经历，因而也能与众人分享我的故事。世上有太多受伤的人。哪怕我们只是尝试一下，生命中也会拥有些伟大的经历。”

送给大家一句力克的格言：是奇迹忘了眷顾你吗？也许你就是个奇迹。

生命的长河中遇到一些险滩礁石才会溅起美丽的浪花。让我们像力克胡哲一样为自己的人生创造奇迹吧！

ted演讲观后感 篇8

他诞生在澳大利亚的一个普通家庭中，他从小没有双臂，没有双腿，仅仅只有一个“小鸡腿”，然而这个仅有单只的“小鸡腿”的他，却能够笑容每天绽放在唇边。

那是一个特别的演讲。“我是生来就没有手和脚的，在医学上也找不出原因。我没有四肢，但我有‘小鸡腿’。力克·胡哲一上台就拿自己的身体开启了玩笑。他语言幽默滑稽，丝毫感觉不到对命运的埋怨与不满。他一直在拿自己的“小鸡腿”来调侃，在我们看来是笑一笑就罢了，但是对于他来说，是得克服了多少心理障碍和痛苦，才能坦然地和我们分享这一切。他利用他那短小变形的“小鸡腿”，做出一连串灵活的动作。如踢球，接电话，打鼓等。他说，他感激上天还给他留下这只“小鸡腿”。

在他演讲过程中，有一句话令我感触很深。他“站”在桌子上，从左走到右，一次一步，虽然走的缓慢但最终还是会到达终点。onestepatime是他的方式，也是支撑他继续前进的信念。他告诉我们一次一步，一步一生。没有人能够一步登天只有不断努力坚持。

记得他说过：“你可以让自己酩酊大醉，但第二天早上，在头痛中醉醒过来，仍要面对同样的问题。”许多人会沉溺在悲伤中不能自拔，怨天尤人，怀疑一切，并开始选择各种方式麻醉自己，把快乐建立在短暂的事情上，尝试着逃避一切。但是，“向错误的方向举步，只会让你远离梦想。”这是力克说的。

为了更好地证明他的话，他自行跌到在台上，然后努力地扭动身子，用那只“小鸡腿”和肩头的力量，支撑着站了起来，顿时，全场掌声雷鸣。他向着学生们说：“只要不断尝试，总有站起来的希望！”

如此振奋人心的话语，我记住了，且深受感动。

人生最可悲的并非失去四肢，而是没有生存的希望和目标。人们不该老是埋怨自己没有什么，而该好好想想你可以做的是什么。

ted演讲观后感 篇9

Dear,

Different people have different dreams. Some people dream of making a lotof money. Some people dream of living a happy life. Some people dream of beingfamous. Some people dream of going abroad, and so on. But my dream is e you will get a surprise after you know my dream.

I have a wonderful dreamin my heart. Its to speak English very well. Since English is everything for ish is my best friend. English is my soul. English is my power. WithoutEnglish, Im nothing at all. Nothing. Now, I can think in English, speak inEnglish, and write in English. Some people think Im an Indian. Some peopleregard Im a Pakistan. And some people even consider that Im an Egyptian. But ifI could speak English as good as an American, my future would be brilliant. So Iwork very hard.

ted演讲观后感 篇10

“为人生做出改变时，开始总是最难的，过程总是最痛的，结果却是最好的。”影片《国王的演讲》中莱纳尔·罗格的话振聋发聩，在客观的叙述中给予了所有亟待为人生改变的彷徨者一丝鼓励和慰藉。一首亦师亦友而惺惺相惜的真挚情谊歌，一部直面苦难与自我救赎的国王抗争史，一场汤姆霍伯导演笔触下关乎爱与责任的抉择的立足大局而理性深刻的宏大之戏剧，第83届奥斯卡最佳影片《国王的演讲》聚焦于二战时期英王乔治六世在种种波折后终于登基并在此间直面苦难、达成自我救赎并收获友情的史实，借由隐喻颇丰的镜头语言的表达、细腻灵动的音效处理以及创作者对于剧本的智慧处理展现了导演不落窠臼的历史关怀和人文反思。

就影片的镜头运用而言，色彩上的意境塑造、手持镜头的使用，特写、近景、远近的切换，深焦浅焦的转换以及较有层次的打光，无一落下，在展现导演超高创作技巧的同时暗藏隐喻，引起观者的反思。

首先，整部影片在色调方面便是采用了在肤色线上的橙色与湖蓝，在给予观影者舒适体验感的意境中将整个故事娓娓道来。而镜头语言的表达则在镜头的运动以及光线的投射上暗藏玄机，在影片的开头，约克公爵上楼梯预备演讲，这时导演运用的是手持镜头，而手持镜头带来的那种摇晃感与不确定感也正折射出了约克公爵的内心：紧张、忐忑而恐惧。这是由他过往的阴影造成的，而他是否能够克服恐惧并找到自我救赎便是不确定的，这个小而不起眼的隐喻却为全片的结尾埋下了伏笔，实乃妙笔。

此外，影片最令人记忆深刻的地方还在于罗格与伯蒂在语言治疗所内的沟通场景。伯蒂初次接受罗格先生的语言治疗时，两人的目光给人的感觉是对不上的，而导演正是运用了特写镜头来处理这一正反打，并要求演员的视线看向画面的外部而非镜头的中心，从而营造出了一种两人沟通起来并不直接的感觉。这与影片最后两人排练加冕典礼的时候，罗格坐在伯蒂的宝座上而最终激发本不愿选择登上帝位的伯蒂喊出“我就是你的国王!”的那一番争执形成对比，在那个部分导演取用的则是近景的拍摄手法，两人的视线直直相对，也正表明了两者已然敞开心扉并真正做到了互相了解，只是由于观念的不合而引起矛盾。两次争执，导演在特写与近景的切换中以两人的目光朝向暗喻二者关系，不可不说是创作者智慧的体现。同样，在初次治疗结束后伯蒂走出内阁时，导演也采取了近景的摄制手法，但是它偏重于叙事而非艺术表现与意境营造。而后剧本的发展部分，罗格与伯蒂双双行走在大街上，当罗格劝说伯蒂走上王位后，伯蒂无法直面自己的内心便对罗格进行了一番带有羞辱意味的说教。伯蒂愤怒离去，留下罗格一人在大街上无措而又无奈，此时导演则运用了远景设置以及类似美国三十年前惯用的摄制方法，即浅焦摄影，它并未迎合人类实际的视觉体验，却是在浅焦中完成了对罗格当下心理的细致刻画以及影片即将发展到高潮的气氛营造。

音效处理作为影片渲染气氛，激发观众观影情绪高潮的重要手段，《国王的演讲》这部影片对其的处理可谓是做到了与情节的高度契合的同时在细腻灵动的音效中舒缓了观众的内心。影片开端，呈现的即是钢琴中弦的演奏并加之竖琴及小型木管乐器如长笛作辅，在这样的极简主义伴奏基调中，偶尔的重音也确实在强调主角在自我的控制中徘徊挣扎，同时，古典乐器的舒缓魅力给予了观影者身心放松的美妙体验，能够令人快速的进入情境并开始对于那段真实历史的品鉴与思考。此后，随着影片情节的建立，弦乐打开，两位主角之间的友谊像花朵一样，音乐也是如此，偶尔轻快跳跃，成为两者在相知中关系逐渐升温的重要隐喻，令观者感受到真挚情谊的美好。

有人考证发现，其实历史上的罗格医生是有营业执照的，但是影片为什么要将这一情节进行改编呢?创作者的智慧便于此时显露—这其实同样对应着故事的主题。行医执照代表社会对于罗格的认同，但一个没有行医执照却有治疗能力的罗格其实更能对应一个不被周围人认可却可以成为一个有担当的好国王的乔治六世，而这样的改编也正是影片进行的一种巧妙的对故事的结构化处理。此外，影片令人印象颇深的一点还在于结尾处伯蒂成功的完成了演讲后，罗格对他说在发W音时仍有些结巴，国王却幽默诙谐地回答他说不能太流利，怕被怀疑是替身。他之所以会这么说，正是因为他接受了自己是一个结巴，但同时也是一个国王，从此他可以不再去纠结他过往的苦难生活，他的直面苦难最终达成了他对自我的救赎。而随着他自我认同的逐渐上升，他也通过演讲取得了社会的认同并作为一个称职的国王鼓舞了整个国家。其实每个人都是如此，周围可能有很多人会不认同我们，甚至有意无意地流露出不信任，但一个人更应该直面人生中遭受过的排挤、不公等种种苦难，以自己对自己的认同作为力量，救赎自己，达成与自我和社会的和解。

纵观整部影片，无论是利用最大化的镜头语言的深刻表意还是细腻灵动的音效处理，抑或是创作者对于剧本的独到改编，都传递出导演的历史关怀与人文反思—选择责任，直面苦难，达成自我救赎。也许今日并不美好，但这并不妨碍我们直面生活中的种种不堪，与自我和解，努力救赎自我并赢得社会的尊重。

ted演讲观后感 篇11

今天上午的体育课没有上，于是周老师走进了班级，让我们看了一个视频，起初的我是抱着一个比较随意的态度去看，但到了最后，我的态度有了极大的转变，十分有感触。

这个视频是《我和世界不一样》，首先映入眼帘的是，一个无四肢，有一脸胡子的人站在桌子上，正在说话，而此时我对他的第一个反应就是，咦，为什么这个人没有手也没有脚？好可怜呀，他是怎样生活的？他是怎样做那些手脚齐全的，可以做的任何事呢？我带着许多疑问去看这个视频，慢慢的这些疑问解决了，而且让我觉得这个人十分乐观又开朗，即风趣而又幽默，非常平易近人，令人觉得很亲切，人缘也超级好，这些都让人觉得他和普通人没啥两样，他就是尼克·胡哲，尼克是国际公益组织，“lifewithout”的总裁及首席执行官，也出过很多书，可这也引起了我的深思，一个无四肢的人，能够取得如此多的成就，可以有一个这样有意义的人生，那么我们呢？我们四肢齐全，但我们有没有使每一天都过得有意义，使自己的人生有价值吗？不，我们没有。那么我们是不是应该从现在开始牢牢抓住自己的，每一分，每一秒，珍惜时间，去多做一些有意义的事呢？我想答案肯定是，是的，我们就应该这样做，用实际行动去证明自己。

期中考试考完了，真的是有人欢喜，有人忧，啊！但我们不应该因考得好就松懈，骄傲。因考得不好，就放弃自卑，我们在顺境中，应更加坚定的向前前进，在逆境中，应不畏惧困难，一路向前冲去。

每个人都要相信自己要有信心，要相信我们每个人在世界里都是很重要的，与世界不一样的。